Times Higher Education (THE) has informed us that it has reached a "groundbreaking" agreement with the Hungarian Ministry of Culture and Innovation.
It seems that THE will analyse Hungary's higher education system and benchmark with successful higher education hubs according to the "gold standard" world rankings and provide advice and "unparalleled data insights" to Hungarian universities. The cost of this exercise is not mentioned, but it is unlikely to be trivial.
The Hungarian State Secretary for Innovation and Higher Education referred to the presence of Hungarian universities in the THE rankings. Eleven are now in the THE world rankings whereas five years ago seven were listed.
That sounds very impressive, but wait a minute.
THE tells us in the 2018-19 rankings, there were 1258 universities, of which 1250 were ranked, and in 2023-24, there were 2671, of which 1906 were ranked. It would be remarkable if the number of Hungarian universities did not increase, and it is no big deal that they did.
What is relevant is the number of universities in the top thousand in each edition. For Hungary, it was six in the 2019 rankings and three in 2024. If the THE rankings mean anything, then the quality of Hungarian universities has apparently declined over the last five years.
Hungarian universities, however, have generally been drifting downwards in most rankings, not because they are getting worse in absolute terms but because of the steady rise of Asian, especially Chinese, research-based universities.
Moreover, the THE world rankings rate Hungarian universities worse than any other global ranking. The latest edition of the THE World University Rankings (WUR) shows three in the world's top 1000. There are five in the top 1000 in the latest QS rankings, four in the Shanghai rankings, five in Leiden Ranking, four in the US News Best Global Universities, four in URAP, five in CWUR, six in Webometrics, and eight in RUR.
The pattern is clear. THE now consistently underestimates the performance of Hungarian universities compared to other rankers. Not only that but some Hungarian universities have dropped significantly in the THE rankings. Eotvos Lorand University has gone from 601-800 to 801-1000, Pecs University from 601-800 to 1001-1200 and Budapest University of Technology and Economics from 801-1000 to 1201-1500.
On the other hand, a couple of Hungarian universities, Semmelweis and Debrecen, have risen through participation in multi-author multi-citation projects.
It is difficult to see what benefit Hungary will get from paying THE for insights, reports, and targets from an organization that has limited competence in the assessment and analysis of academic performance. Seriously, what insights could you get from an organization that in recent years has declared Anglia Ruskin University to be the world leader for research impact, Anadolu University for knowledge transfer, and Macau University of Science and Technology for International Outlook?
It is true that THE is outstanding in public relations and event management, and the universities will no doubt benefit from high praise at prestigious events and receive favourable headlines and awards. It is hard, though, to see that THE are able to provide the knowledgeable and informed advice that universities need to make difficult decisions in the coming years.
