The National Taiwan University rankings have been overlooked by the Western media, which is a shame since they can provide useful and interesting insights.
For example, there are indicators for articles in the SCIE and the SSCI of the Web of Science database over 11 years and over the current year, which for this year's edition is 2023. For both metrics, the top scorer, which in these cases is Harvard, is assigned a score of 100, and the others are calibrated accordingly.
If a university has a score for the one-year indicator that is significantly higher than the score for eleven years, it is likely that they have made significant progress during 2023 compared to the previous decade. Conversely, if a university does much better for the eleven-year indicator than for the current year, it could mean that it has entered a period of low productivity.
Looking at the current ranking, we notice that most leading US, British, and Australian universities are doing well for the current year, with the notable exceptions of the Los Angeles, Berkeley, San Diego, and Davis campuses of the University of California. Saudi universities also do well, but French universities are down for the year.
The big story here is that Chinese universities do much worse for the current year than the 11-year period. Here are the Article scores for five leading institutions:
Tsinghua University 57.9 for eleven years and 47.2 for the current year
Zhejiang University 64.7 and 55.4
Shanghai Jiao Tong University 65 and 52.8
Peking University 57.1 and 48
Sun Yat-Sen University 54.1 and 47.1.
And so on and so on.
So what is going on? I can think of several possible explanations. Firstly, we are seeing the temporary effect of the Covid restrictions, and soon we shall see a rebound.
Secondly, this is the beginning of a new period of decline for Chinese sciences, and we shall see a further decline in the next few years.
Thirdly, and I think most plausibly, China has lost interest in engagement with the West, whether this means partnerships with elite institutions, publications in scientific journals, or participation in surveys and rankings. This aligns with the abstention from the THE Impact rankings. the lack of data submission to the TOP 500 international ranking of supercomputers, and low scores in the QS sustainability rankings, which suggests a lack of interest in those metrics.
Whatever the reason, we should have a better idea over the next year or two.
