... the University of Cape Town. What a surprise!
Times Higher Education (THE) has produced
another "snapshot" ranking. This one is a list of 15 African universities ranked according to "research influence", that is the number of citations per paper normalised by field and year. It seems that a larger list will be published at a THE summit at the university of Johannesburg scheduled for the end of this month. Then, apparently, there will be discussions about full rankings with a broad range of indicators.
This is a smart move. Apart from diluting the impact of the QS BRICS rankings, this table puts the summit host in the top ten and gets attention from around the continent with three places in the north, two in the west and two in the east in the top fifteen.
Here is the top 15:
1. University of Cape Town, South Africa
2. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
3. Makerere University, Uganda
4. Stellenbosch University, South Africa
5. University of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa
6. University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria
7. University of the Western Cape, South Africa
8. University of Nairobi, Kenya
9. University of Johannesburg, South Africa
10. Universite Cadi Ayyad, Morrocco
11. University of Pretoria, South Africa
12. University of Ghana
13. University of South Africa
14. Suez Canal University, Egypt
15. Universite Hassan II, Morrocco.
This is, of course, just one indicator but even so there will be a few academic eyebrows rising around the continent. Makerere has a good national and regional reputation but does it have more research influence than all but two South African universities?
How come Suez Canal University is there but not Cairo University or the American University in Cairo? And I am sure that in Nigeria there will be a lot of smirking around Ahmadu Bello and Ibadan Universities about Port Harcourt in sixth place.
One very good thing about this "experimental and preliminary ranking" is that THE and data provider Scopus are now using fractionalised counting of citations, so that if 100 universities contribute to a publication they each get credit for one hundredth of the citations.
That has not stopped Makerere and Port Harcourt from getting a boost, perhaps too much of a boost, for taking part in a huge multinational medical study but it has reduced the distortions that this indicator can cause.
So, for once, well done THE!... Now, what about taking a look at secondary affiliations?