I have always thought that university ranking organisations are unimaginative in their choice of names. Surely they could do better than ARWU, WUR and HEEACT? I admit though that SCIMAGO sounds a bit better. What about renaming one of the tables the Comparative Ranking of Academic Performance?
For a moment, when reading the text below, I thought QS had come with a slightly more interesting name for their rankings, SUE, but it is, it seems, just the QS WUR somewhat mutated by translation in and out of Farsi.
"QS World University Ranking asks head of ISC (Islamic World Science Citation Center) for cooperation in electing high ranked universities of the world.
IBNA: According to the public relations of ISC, each year the QS World University Ranking releases the list of top world universities and for the year 2011, Dr Jafar Mehrad is asked for cooperation in electing high-ranked universities.
Meanwhile, ten out of total state and non-state Iranian universities and 30 universities from Asia and the Middle East are to be sorted in this election according to the criteria of this ranking system.
For the election of top world universities, 300 experts are annually invited and this year Dr Jafar Mehrad is one of the jurors.
The results of QS World University ranking will be released in autumn 2011. "
Meanwhile, ten out of total state and non-state Iranian universities and 30 universities from Asia and the Middle East are to be sorted in this election according to the criteria of this ranking system.
For the election of top world universities, 300 experts are annually invited and this year Dr Jafar Mehrad is one of the jurors.
The results of QS World University ranking will be released in autumn 2011. "
I wonder where the bit about 300 jurors came from.
No comments:
Post a Comment