Thomson Reuters have published another document, The World's Most Influential Scientific Minds, which contains the most highly cited researchers for the period 2002-13. This one includes only the primary affiliation of the researchers, not the secondary ones. If the Shanghai ARWU rankings, due in August, use this list rather than the one published previously, they will save themselves a lot of embarrassment.
Over at arxiv, Lutz Bornmann and Johann Bauer have produced a ranking of the leading institutions according to the number of highly cited researchers' primary affiliation. Here are their top ten universities, with government agencies and independent research centres omitted.
1. University of California (all campuses)
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. University of Texas (all campuses)
5. University of Oxford
6. Duke University
7. MIT
8. University of Michigan (all campuses)
9. Northwestern University
10. Princeton
Compared to the old list, used for the Highly Cited indicator in the first Shanghai rankings in 2003, Oxford and Northwestern are doing better and MIT and Princeton somewhat worse.
Bornmann and Bauer have also ranked universities according to the number of primary and secondary affiliations,counting each recorded affiliation as a fraction). The top ten are:
1. University of California (all campuses)
2. Harvard
3. King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4. Stanford
5. University of Texas
6. MIT
7. Oxford
8. University of Michigan
9. University of Washington
10. Duke
The paper concludes:
"To counteract attempts at manipulation, ARWU should only consider primary
institutions of highly cited researchers. "
No comments:
Post a Comment